GAO releases critical national biodefense study results

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) on Thursday released the results of a critical study of the country’s biodefense enterprise and their ability to defend the county in the case of crisis.

“The biodefense enterprise is fragmented and does not have strategic oversight to promote efficiency and accountability,” the report said. “Specifically, the biodefense enterprise lacks institutionalized leadership enterprise-wide to provide strategic oversight and coordination. In 2011, GAO reported, there are more than two dozen presidentially appointed individuals with biodefense responsibilities and numerous federal agencies with mission responsibilities for supporting biodefense activities, but no individual or entity with responsibility for overseeing the entire biodefense enterprise.

“In 2011, GAO reported that the Homeland Security Council (HSC) should consider establishing a focal point for federal biodefense coordination. In December 2014, National Security Council (NSC) staff, which supports the HSC, told GAO that two of its directorates work together as the focal point for federal biodefense efforts. This is an important step in promoting a comprehensive and coordinated approach to biodefense, but strategic leadership issues persist.”

The report advocates for the implementation of an integrated national strategy that would guide both public and private responses to the sudden onset of an biological outbreak that could potentially affect national security.

“In 2011, we reported that while some high-level biodefense strategies have been developed, there is no broad, integrated national strategy that encompasses all stakeholders with biodefense responsibilities that can be used to guide the systematic identification of risk; assess resources needed to address those risks; and prioritize and allocate investment across the entire biodefense enterprise.

”We have also previously reported that choices must be made about protection priorities given the risk and how to best allocate available resources Further, neither the Office of Management and Budget nor the federal agencies account for biodefense spending across the entire federal government. As a result, the federal government does not know how much is being spent on this critical national security priority. We reported that the overarching biodefense enterprise would benefit from strategic oversight mechanisms, including a national strategy, to ensure efficient, effective, and accountable results, and suggested the HSC take action.”

HPN News Desk

Recent Posts

DoD challenge brings opportunities for nine new ideas in talent management

A Department of Defense (DoD) 2040 Task Force (D2T) challenge on talent management innovation drew…

2 days ago

TSA publishes final rule on Flight Training Security Program improvements

For the first time since its creation in 2004, the Transportation Security Administration’s (TSA) Flight…

2 days ago

FEMA launches new hurricane season campaign with multicultural messaging on flood risks

The 2024 Hurricane Season Campaign began for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) this week,…

3 days ago

SERVICE Act of 2024 seeks DOJ pilot program, grants for local veteran response teams

As a way to support veterans, U.S. Reps. Maria Elvira Salazar (R-FL), Dale Strong (R-AL),…

3 days ago

DHS publishes guidelines for securing critical infrastructure and weapons against AI threats

Mere days after the Department of Homeland Security formed a new Artificial Intelligence (AI) Safety…

4 days ago

U.S. Army and European Command awards KBR $771M contract

KBR will continue to provide life support, equipment readiness, training and supply chain solutions for…

4 days ago

This website uses cookies.