News

New House legislation would put nuclear testing decisions in congressional hands

Democratic representatives and senators have introduced the No Nuclear Testing Without Approval Act to make nuclear testing dependent on Congressional authorization.

The effort comes from U.S. Reps. Steven Horsford (D-NV), Reps. Susie Lee (D-NV), Ben McAdams (D-UT), Jimmy Panetta (D-CA), and TJ Cox (D-CA), along with U.S. Sen. Cortez Masto (D-NV) with an eye on barring nuclear testing in Nevada and elsewhere. The issue has been particularly heated regarding Nevada, as the state currently houses the only site in the nation capable of underground nuclear testing.

“The Secretaries of Defense and Energy have reported to the President that the U.S. stockpile is safe, secure, and effective in the absence of nuclear testing,” Horsford said. “Restarting nuclear testing is unnecessary and would have far-reaching consequences on Nevada’s environment and the health and safety of my constituents. Any decision that brings dangerous explosives to our backyard must carefully consider the long-term effects on our state. This legislation will ensure that Congress can provide the appropriate oversight and accountability measures necessary and determine any risk this many pose to the surrounding area.”

The legislation would create a congressional approval process that would keep National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) duties intact. It would update the Atomic Energy Defense Act to require a Joint Resolution of Approval from Congress for any resumption of explosive nuclear testing. Further, it would allow any resumption to move forward only after a foreign state has conducted a nuclear test, or if all three national security labs and the commander of the U.S. Strategic Command can agree on a technical need for one.

Alternatives would also have to be detailed in a report explaining why testing should proceed.

“The President should not be using dangerous nuclear tests as a political tool, especially when it threatens the lives of millions of Americans,” Cox said. “Any decision that puts the use of nuclear weapons on American soil should require Congressional approval to ensure that nuclear testing is only done when absolutely necessary and that it is done in a way that won’t put American lives at risk.”

Chris Galford

Recent Posts

House advances aid for Ukraine, Israel and defense manufacturing after weeks of doubt

The U.S. House of Representatives advanced a $95 billion package (H.R.815) over the weekend that…

9 hours ago

Ammunition Supply Chain Act proposes mandated reporting on materials key to U.S. ammunition manufacturing

Under a new bill – the Ammunition Supply Chain Act – proposed in the House…

9 hours ago

Restoring American Deterrence Act seeks nuclear overhauls to deter China and Russia

Focused on China and Russia as the combined threats of the present and future, a…

1 day ago

Bipartisan House effort seeks sanctions for Chinese firms backing Russian invasion of Ukraine

This week, a collection of Republican and Democratic legislators introduced a bill to sanction any…

4 days ago

Eight preparedness grant recipients to split $1.8B from DHS

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) recently announced more than $1.8 billion in preparedness…

5 days ago

DHS opens applications for 2024 Targeted Violence and Terrorism Prevention grant program

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security released a notice of funding opportunity for its Fiscal…

6 days ago

This website uses cookies.