News

Congress advances legislation to address shoreline erosion on Great Lakes to president’s desk

After securing U.S. House support last week, the Safeguarding Tomorrow through Ongoing Risk Mitigation (STORM) Act, which is meant to reduce risks of flooding, rising water levels, and shoreline erosion along the Great Lakes, is headed for final review by the president.

Introduced by U.S. Sens. Gary Peters (D-MI), Ron Johnson (R-WI), Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) and James Lankford (R-OK), and guided in the House by U.S. Rep. Angie Craig (D-MN), the bill offers support to affected communities facing climate change induced natural disasters. Such disasters have caused millions of dollars in damage to date, destroying buildings and beaches alike. Federal loans, as offered under STORM, could help local governments to better mitigate such problems.

“Providing cost-effective tools directly to local communities across Michigan is critical to helping them stave off the harmful effects that coastal erosion, flooding and rising water levels have on people’s lives and livelihoods,” Peters said.

Under the proposal, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) would fund and help states create revolving loan funds for local governments. These loans would be expressly used for projects that reduce natural disaster risks, such as shoreline erosion or water levels, and would be accessible more quickly than traditional FEMA grants. The bill’s supporters cited studies showing that resilience and mitigation spending, like that proposed under STORM, saves taxpayers more than $6 for every dollar invested.

“Current hazard mitigation funds, such as those provided through the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities program authorized under the Disaster Recovery Reform Act, are made available to communities only after disasters strike,” Johnson said. “These programs that fund hazard mitigation projects are critical, but we also need to focus on building resiliency in communities before they happen. Studies have shown that for every $1 spent on hazard mitigation, $6 is saved in the response and recovery process. This bill will help address and fund projects before disasters strike, saving taxpayer money, and decreasing future loss of life and property.”

The bill has also received the support of groups like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the American Society of Engineers.

Chris Galford

Recent Posts

Pennsylvania earns $10M federal grant to improve crime statistics reporting

In order to move the state closer to federal standards and allow reporting of local…

13 hours ago

DoD innovative technologies pilot funds 13 additional projects

For the next round of participants in a pilot program to Accelerate the Procurement and…

13 hours ago

House advances aid for Ukraine, Israel and defense manufacturing after weeks of doubt

The U.S. House of Representatives advanced a $95 billion package (H.R.815) over the weekend that…

2 days ago

Ammunition Supply Chain Act proposes mandated reporting on materials key to U.S. ammunition manufacturing

Under a new bill – the Ammunition Supply Chain Act – proposed in the House…

2 days ago

Restoring American Deterrence Act seeks nuclear overhauls to deter China and Russia

Focused on China and Russia as the combined threats of the present and future, a…

3 days ago

Bipartisan House effort seeks sanctions for Chinese firms backing Russian invasion of Ukraine

This week, a collection of Republican and Democratic legislators introduced a bill to sanction any…

6 days ago

This website uses cookies.