News

Bill seeks to protect domestic technology research from being used to bolster People’s Liberation Army

A group of legislators recently introduced legislation that would protect domestic technology research from being used by Chinese entities to benefit the People’s Liberation Army (PLA).

U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) led colleagues U.S. Sens. Rick Scott (R-FL), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), Mike Braun (R-IN), Ben Sasse (R-NE), Tom Cotton (R-AR), and Bill Cassidy (R-LA) in introducing the Preventing PLA Acquisition of United States Technology Act of 2022.

Specifically, the bill would prevent federally funded domestic research from being shared or conducted jointly with Chinese entities participating in the Chinese Communist Party’s Military Civil-Fusion strategy. This national development strategy aims to mobilize non-military resources and expertise in China to increase the capabilities and lethality of the PLA. As a result, international exchange with ostensibly civilian institutions in China is now highly vulnerable to PLA appropriation.

“The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is our number one threat,” Rubio said. “Beijing will lie, cheat and steal to become more powerful than the United States. All too often, our nation’s scientists and experts partner with their Chinese counterparts without understanding how their research will be weaponized by the Chinese military.”

Rubio said the measure would prevent such collaboration and protect access to federally funded research from the PLA.

“We know Communist China steals American technology and intellectual property and will stop at nothing in its quest for world domination,” Scott said. “The Preventing PLA Acquisition of United States Technology Act of 2022 will address the serious threat Communist China poses to our technology, national security, and the private information of American citizens.”

Sasse said the United States should not be in the business of funding Chinese aspirations for military supremacy.

“The CCP intentionally blurs the lines between academic research, the commercial private sector, and defense industry to build the next generation of Chinese weapons designed to challenge the United States,” he said. “We should’ve cut federal funding for US agencies, higher education, and private companies that engage in research or technical exchanges with Chinese entities involved in this strategy years ago.”

Douglas Clark

Recent Posts

DHS publishes guidelines for securing critical infrastructure and weapons against AI threats

Mere days after the Department of Homeland Security formed a new Artificial Intelligence (AI) Safety…

1 day ago

U.S. Army and European Command awards KBR $771M contract

KBR will continue to provide life support, equipment readiness, training and supply chain solutions for…

1 day ago

Spectrum and National Security Act introduced to modernize spectrum policy, revamp FCC authority

In a bid to update federal spectrum and communications network policy, restore the auction authority…

2 days ago

Department of Homeland Security forms AI Safety and Security Board

As a new means to advise the Secretary of Homeland Security and stakeholders, and promote…

2 days ago

National security upgrades, pay raises and more pushed in Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement Act

Members of Congress recently paraded a mix of recommended updates to benefit military service members…

3 days ago

Embattled TikTok in jeopardy as President Biden signs legislative ban

The ByteDance-owned TikTok faces an uphill battle in the United States after President Joe Biden…

6 days ago

This website uses cookies.